Mr. James M. Thunder wrote this article. I find it interesting. Its a contradiction of terms when it comes to the Pro-Life movement. The pro-life movement is dead set against adoptees having their information. They think falsely that adoptee access would cause more women to abort.
Why is it okay for this case for the children to have the identifying information but not in the milllions of other cases of adoptees? Their website is very much against abortion. NOW has fought against this group.
NOW has RICO charges against them and a couple of others. NOW ought to consider the natural mothers of the past. NOW ought to consider adoption now as a way of shoring up their case. Adoption is an industry that separates women and children. It is an industry that is based on money. It is not based on families and children.